David Ellison spent eight months persuading Washington that buying Warner Bros. Discovery would strengthen competition in Hollywood, and it worked.
The Justice Department closed its antitrust review in June and cleared the deal. However, things have taken an unexpected turn.
A group of state attorneys general, led by California, is finalizing an antitrust lawsuit that could freeze the transaction well past the closing date that Paramount Skydance (PSKY) promised investors.
Oregon has gone further, asking a judge to pause the deal for 60 days while it examines how Paramount lobbied federal officials.
Paramount shares felt the impact. The stock trades near $9.34, sitting near the bottom of its 52-week range of $8.62to$20.86.
It is down about 29% this year and roughly 9% over the past five trading sessions.
Why state attorneys general can still block the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal
Federal clearance does not end the fight.
State attorneys general hold independent authority under U.S. antitrust law, and a Justice Department decision not to sue does nothing to stop them from filing their own case, Fox Business reported.
More Media and Entertainment Stocks:
- Paramount’s WBD merger faces a major regulatory hurdle
- Netflix has a stunning milestone in sight for 2027
- Disney’s next growth story isn’t parks or movies
The multistate suit could be filed within days, CNN Business reported, citing people familiar with the process.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has voiced concerns for months, and his office says the investigation remains active.
Critics argue that combining two of the five largest studios would thin out competition in film, streaming, and news.
Paramount rejects that argument, telling CNN it is confident the transaction raises no legitimate antitrust concerns.
Busà Photography / Getty Images
Oregon’s lobbying probe and the “Project Warrior” documents
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield is conducting a narrower, more direct inquiry.
According to the Oregon Department of Justice, he has asked a Multnomah County court to compel Paramount to hand over records tied to an internal lobbying effort the company code-named “Project Warrior.”
Rayfield also wants to know whether Paramount helped write the DOJ statement that cleared the deal.
According to him, this document was unusual because the agency normally speaks up when challenging a merger rather than clearing one.
Related: ‘Michael’ gives Lionsgate stock timely Hollywood test
Under that request is a Wall Street Journal report that senior officials overruled career staff attorneys who had leaned toward challenging the deal.
Rayfield has said that if approval turned out to be the product of a corrupt bargain, it would change how Oregon reads its own evidence.
Paramount calls the demands irrelevant to Oregon antitrust law and notes it has already produced more than 822,000 documents, TheWrap reported.
A hearing is set for Monday, July 13.
The $650 million ticking fee that turns delay into cash burn
Litigation risk is usually something shareholders can ignore. But not this time. Here, the cost is easy to see.
According to Paramount‘s merger agreement, if the deal has not closed by Sept. 30, 2026, Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders collect a 25-cent-per-share “ticking fee” every quarter until it does.
That works out to roughly $650 million a quarter.
A ticking fee is simply compensation to the target’s shareholders for waiting. It rewards them for patience and punishes the buyer for being slow.
A delay also pushes back the $6 billion in cost savings Paramount has told investors it will capture after closing, Benzinga noted.
The company is already expected to carry about $80 billion in debt once the transaction completes.
4 things that have to go right before Paramount Skydance stock recovers
The bull case has not disappeared, but it now depends on a sequence of events landing in order.
- Brussels clears the deal by its July 22 deadline after Paramount agreed to exit its film distribution venturewith Universal, Variety reported.
- The U.K. concludes its media plurality review, with Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy saying she is minded to intervene.
- The Oregon judge declines to grant a 60-day pause.
- The multistate suit either fails to materialize or fails to win an injunction.
Miss any one of those and the Sept. 30 date slips, which means the fee starts accruing.
How PSKY stock stacks up against the market and its peers
The gap between Paramount Skydance and the broader market says a lot.
PSKY is down about 29% this year. Operationally, the company is not falling apart, as first-quarter revenue reached $7.35 billion, up 2.2% from a year earlier.
Paramount’s earnings also beat consensus by a wide margin, according to the company’s SEC filing.
However, Wall Street is unconvinced. Wells Fargo cut its target to $7 from $8 and kept an underweight rating.
Guggenheim reduced its target to $12 while maintaining a neutral rating, citing debt concerns. The consensus rating across Wall Street is a moderate sell.
The market is not pricing an operating problem. It is pricing the odds that a judge grants a pause on the merger.
What investors should watch next in the Paramount Warner Bros. saga
Merger arbitrage is a bet on timing as much as outcome, and right now, the calendar is what matters.
Monday’s Multnomah County hearing is the first real test. The July 22 EU decision follows, and the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority faces an Aug. 7 deadline on its Phase 1 review.
Any state lawsuit filed in between could add months.
None of that guarantees the deal will die, as State challenges do not always succeed.
However, a coalition of attorneys general did stall Nexstar’s takeover of Tegna earlier this year when a judge froze that transaction ahead of trial.
For investors, the practical question narrows to how much delay they are willing to tolerate.
Even if the merger closes, the buyer inherits $80 billion in debt and pays $650 million a quarter to the other side’s shareholders until it does.
So the real question is not whether the deal survives, but how long you can afford to wait for it. The courts have the final say on that.
Related: AMC stock traders ignoring warning signs send shares surging
